CONCEPTS

Staking Plans Compared: Flat, Percentage, Kelly and Martingale

Four ways to size a bet, what each does to your bankroll in a bad run, and why one of them is a guaranteed way to lose everything.

Flat staking risks the same amount every time. It is boring, it is nearly impossible to get wrong, and it is what most profitable bettors actually use. Percentage staking risks a fixed share of the current bankroll, so stakes shrink automatically in a downswing and grow in an upswing.

Kelly sizes each bet by your edge: the bigger the gap between your probability and the price, the more you risk. It maximises long-run growth mathematically, and it is brutally sensitive to overestimating your own edge. Most people who use it should use a quarter of it.

Martingale doubles after every loss to recover. It works beautifully until the run that does not end, at which point it takes everything. Eight consecutive losses starting at one unit needs a 256-unit bet to recover, and the table limit or your balance arrives first. It is not a staking plan, it is a delayed bankruptcy.

Key points

Frequently asked

Which staking plan should a beginner use?
Flat staking at 1% of bankroll per bet. It removes an entire category of mistakes while you find out whether your selections are any good.
Is Kelly worth using?
Fractional Kelly is, at a quarter or a half. Full Kelly assumes your probability estimate is correct, and almost nobody's is.
Why do people still use Martingale?
Because it wins constantly, in small amounts, right up until the loss that takes the entire bankroll. The frequent small wins hide the one catastrophic outcome.

Put it to use

Value calculator →Odds converter →Our open record →Free daily tips →

Read next

MalluSports publishes free predictions and analysis only. We accept no bets, hold no funds, and hold no gambling licence. Every monetary figure shown across this site is virtual and illustrative. Betting carries real risk. 18+ · begambleaware.org