Answered with numbers you can check — including ours.
Run four checks, in this order. First, was the pick published before kick-off? A screenshot posted afterwards proves nothing, which is why verification platforms timestamp selections at the moment they are entered. Second, are the losers shown? A record with no losing picks is not a good record, it is an edited one. Third, is the price obtainable? A tipster quoting odds nobody could actually get is inflating returns on paper. Fourth, is the sample big enough to mean anything? Fifty picks tells you almost nothing.
Independent verification platforms such as Tipstrr and Blogabet exist because of exactly this problem: they record the selection and the odds at entry, then settle it automatically, so the tipster never touches the result. That removes the two easiest ways to fake a record.
MalluSports publishes its full record openly: currently 93 settled picks, 55 won and 38 lost, a 59.1% strike rate at average odds 1.96, and 10.5% ROI at flat one-unit stakes. Every settled pick is downloadable with its final score, so any row can be recomputed rather than taken on trust. Over 2.5 Goals is currently the model's worst published market at -29.2% ROI over 15 settled picks - that is published on the same page as the winning markets, because a record that only shows what worked is advertising.
MalluSports is a free prediction and analysis service only. It accepts no bets, holds no funds, operates no gambling platform and holds no gambling licence. Betting carries real financial risk. 18+ · begambleaware.org